For years I’ve been making the joke about Vladimir Putin’s food taster. As in: Who is that guy? How did he get the job? How does he keep the job? What’s his pulse rate when he tries out the caviar? And, if he’s only the latest, how long do Vlad’s Official Tasters last?
Now, with Putin feeling pressure on a number of fronts, I’ve begun wondering Who Tastes Putin’s Food Taster’s Food? I mean, we are talking Russia here, where a long line of kings and czars and leaders of one stripe or another have, um, “succumbed to nefarious retribution” by one time loyalists suddenly in the mood for their blood.
Obviously, I am no Russia expert. But Russia and Russians have occupied a significant space in my alleged mind nearly my entire life. I was 11 years old during the Cuban missile crisis. We actually did the “duck and cover” drills in grade school. The godless Russian Red Menace was a regular feature of my Catholic upbringing as well as the evening news when I toddled home from school.
As a result, over the years, I’ve padded out the usual consumption of news stories and analyses of Russian government behavior with books about the country, films from the old Soviet Union and more lately, YouTube series from Russian vloggers. Eventually, you do get a grasp of something like the “average Russian mind set”. A mentality set in a startlingly shambolic realm where, to quote the title of one of the better recent books I’ve read, “… Nothing Is True and Everything is Possible.“
Consuming the reporting and punditry of the past five days, I note that plenty is being said about the sanctions on Putin and his closest circle of oligarchs — iuncluding very high profile characters like Chelsea football team owner Roman Abramovich, an early “investor” in Russia’s oil and aluminum businesses. Few believe Putin’s fortune, thought to be well protected in Swiss banks and other off-shore accounts, is in any immediate danger, as in next month or next year. But there have been noisy public statements from European countries — Britain in particular, where the capital has been so saturated with Russian mobster money it has been nicknamed “Londongrad” — that they will at long, long last make life difficult for flagrant thieves who own not one, but two 400-foot yachts, their own personal 787 and … a Premier League football team.
A side story of great interest to me is what the notoriously corrupt international soccer agency, FIFA, floating on gobs of Russian mob money, does in response — to the response — to Putin’s invasion? (Imagine the reaction of American chuckleheads of Biden did something that obliterated the NFL?)
(Another not at all far-fetched notion is what a Spanish Civil War-like call for freedom fighters — from all over the world — to come to Ukraine’s aid might do? Do you doubt there are millions who see this as the moment to make a heroic stand against authoritarian criminals?)
What then does that crowd do to Putin if they are refused access to Western ultra-rich society, have their London, Paris and Miami mansions seized, their children expelled from the toniest British schools and their byzantine financial transactions/money-laundering hobbled by banking restrictions? Is their loyalty to Putin — who made them, despite getting a reported 50% kickback on their lootings — really all enduring? If not, at one point do they in effect, or in reality, gather the Putin family in the basement of a dacha in Yekaterinburg?
The idea of someone — or some cabal — taking out Putin would be preposterous if his invasion of Ukraine didn’t appear so ill-conceived and delusional, so completely divorced from reality. I mean, the guy was on TV the other day ranting — Trump-like — about “drug addicted neo-Nazis”, a reference apparently to Ukraine’s Jewish president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy. (Abramovich is also Jewish.)
If your billions in ill-gotten gains are dependent on a character sounding as histrionic and unhinged as that, how long before you start looking for a food taster who knows his way around a vial of Novichuk?
Along those same lines is this article in the NYTimes:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/26/world/europe/putin-ukraine-advisers.html
Putin Seems to Sideline Advisers on Ukraine, Taking a Political Risk
Authoritarian leaders rely on elite support to govern. Jeopardizing those relationships in wartime could be risky, experts say.
By Amanda Taub
Published Feb. 26, 2022
Updated Feb. 27, 2022, 9:29 a.m. ET
Does President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia have the support he needs at home to wage a costly war in Ukraine?
That may seem like an odd question. After all, Mr. Putin has already invaded Ukraine, suggesting he feels confident in his resources. And his public image is that of a strongman, with the power to direct the Russian state as he pleases.
But no leader can govern alone. And a series of events this week, including Russia’s decision to throttle access to Facebook and censor news about the war in Ukraine, raise questions about just how much political support Mr. Putin will be able to draw on during the conflict.
An early sign that something might be amiss came on Monday in a televised meeting of Russia’s Security Council. Mr. Putin seemed to expect all of the assembled officials to unquestioningly advise him to recognize the independence of Russian-backed separatist regions in eastern Ukraine — a public show of elite support for war, just days before it began in earnest.
But Sergei Naryshkin flubbed his line.
Mr. Naryshkin, the director of foreign intelligence, stuttered uncomfortably when Mr. Putin asked him about recognizing the separatists’ claims. Then he seemed to overcorrect, saying he thought Russia should recognize the breakaway republics as “part of Russia.” Mr. Putin snapped impatiently that Mr. Naryshkin should “speak clearly,” then said dismissively that annexation “was not under discussion.”
The moment seemed so significant because all authoritarian leaders rule by coalition, even if, like Mr. Putin, they often appear to be wielding power on their own.
The specifics of the power-sharing coalitions vary by country, with some leaders backed by the military, and others by wealthy business leaders or other elites. But Mr. Putin’s coalition is primarily made up of the “siloviki,” a group of officials who came to politics after serving in the KGB or other security services, and who now occupy key roles in Russia’s intelligence services, military and other ministries.
“That’s the system that brought him to power, and that’s the system that he has relied on in order to consolidate his power,” said Maria Popova, a political scientist at McGill University in Canada who studies Russian and Ukrainian politics.
For decades, Mr. Putin has proved himself to be highly skilled at maintaining his relationships with elites. And the structure of Mr. Putin’s ruling coalition is an advantage for him, said Erica de Bruin, a political scientist at Hamilton College and the author of a recent book on coups.
“Where political power is more centralized in an individual ruler — as is the case in Russia under Putin — it can be somewhat harder for elites to hold that leader accountable,” she said.
But elites still matter. And the Putin advisers’ apparent confusion during Monday’s meeting, including the exchange with Mr. Naryshkin, gave the impression that Russian president had kept this crucial group out of the loop on his plans.
“He seemed to be humiliating some of these people,” Dr. Popova said — particularly in the way he spoke to Mr. Naryshkin, a prominent silovik who served in the KGB at the same time as Mr. Putin.
Their interaction could have been a fluke brought on by the stress of the moment, of course. And it is notable that all of Mr. Putin’s advisers, including Mr. Naryshkin, ultimately offered their public support on Monday for the president’s decision to recognize the separatist regions.
But even the seating arrangements of Mr. Putin’s recent meetings, in which he has placed himself at a literal distance from his advisers, convey an image that he is separated from everyone, including his elite coalition. It could be because he wanted to avoid catching the coronavirus, reportedly a significant fear for the Russian leader. But some observers, Dr. Popova said, believe Mr. Putin intended to convey the impression that he is the king, and his advisers mere courtiers — a message they might not appreciate.
And then there is the matter of the Russian public. Although public opinion in Russia is not as directly powerful as it would be in a democracy, Mr. Putin’s high levels of public support have long been a source of political strength and leverage for him. No other politician or member of his inner circle has a public reputation even close to his.
But public anger over the war could undermine that advantage, and even become a political liability. The war will strain the Russian economy. And it has already been a blow to Mr. Putin’s public image as a careful and pragmatic steward of Russian interests.
There was low public support for war in Ukraine even before casualties began to mount. A long-running academic survey found in December that only 8 percent of Russians supported a military conflict against Ukraine, and only 9 percent thought that Russia should arm Ukrainian separatists. That is a very large enthusiasm gap for Mr. Putin to overcome.
Mr. Putin’s actions this week suggest he is concerned about the consequences of public anger. On Thursday and Friday, the police arrested hundreds of people who turned out to protest the war in cities across Russia. On Saturday, the government limited access to Facebook and other media sites for the apparent offense of posting stories “in which the operation that is being carried out is called an attack, an invasion or a declaration of war.”
Which brings us to the stakes for Mr. Putin in maintaining his relationship with his inner circle: “Because of the resources and access that they have, elites pose the biggest threat to authoritarian leaders,” said Dr. de Bruin. “Retaining the support of elites is thus crucial to remaining in power.”
And wars often pose a particular threat to leaders’ relationships with elites. “The relationship between authoritarian rulers and their core of elite supporters can be strained when dictators wage war abroad — particularly where elites view the conflict as misguided,” Dr. de Bruin said.
Public anger over war can also increase elites’ perception that a leader is no longer an effective protector of their interests. And if the United States and Europe manage to impose effective sanctions on members of Mr. Putin’s elite coalition, that could make the war costly for them as individuals, as well as risky for Russia. (Some members of that inner circle, including Mr. Naryshkin, had already been on the U.S. Treasury blacklist for years, so it is unclear what incremental effect new restrictions might have on their finances.)
That is not to say that Mr. Putin’s allies will turn on him because he was rude to one of them on television, of course, or that public anger would immediately undermine his presidency.
But there is still reason to pay attention to signs of strain within Mr. Putin’s coalition. Elite dissatisfaction could affect his responsiveness to targeted sanctions, for instance, or the constraints he might face on resources for the conflict in Ukraine. It also could affect whether he has the political capital to stay the course if domestic opposition grows.
And perhaps, if things go very badly, it could mean even more significant consequences for Mr. Putin’s presidency.
“Two-thirds of authoritarian leaders are removed by their own allies,” Dr. Popova said. “If he tightens the screws too much, if he tries to really increase his power at the expense of the ruling authoritarian coalition, then he is threatening his own position.”
That’s good. i wonder how long it’ll be before we learn how isolated Putin really has been these past few years? Ohn the matter of a “Spanish Civil War-like” response to Putin in Ukraine. I see this … https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/christopherm51/american-nato-military-veterans-fight-russia-with-ukraine
Thanks for including the vlog of the young woman from Khabarovsk, which looks a lot like MSP…the sound of crunching footsteps on the hard-packed snow can’t be mistaken for anywhere but an authentic Northern city.
Her vlog was a nice antidote to the toxic news of the day.
And you gotta love this: Fox News screwing up so bad its own people are calling it out!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/28/fox-newss-jennifer-griffin-fully-loses-her-patience-with-foxs-ukraine-punditry/
This is by far the best article I’ve read yet of Putin, Russia and Ukraine:
https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/stephen-kotkin-putin-russia-ukraine-stalin
Yeah, that is excellent. He isn’t afraid to use examples from a millennia of Russian history to argue that there is a mass consciousness here accepting of despotic, kleptocratic rulers. Were they American they’d be wearing MAGA hats.